FEATURES
28 How To Pick Up Beautiful Women
How many times have you seen a gorgeous woman in the course of your
daily life, but didn't approach her because you weren't sure what to
say or how to act? After you read this article, those days will be gone
forever.
Article by John Eagan
72 Some Day My Prince Will Come
The virile prince initially enjoyed being perpetually erect, but after
countless sessions of sex with the kingdom's fairest maidens, he longed
for orgasmic release. Which damsel would be the first to unleash his
lust-filled loins?
Fiction by Evan Hollander
84 A Firm Grasp
What started out as legitimate bra research turned into the most
exciting sexual experience of this self-admitted boob hound's life.
Fiction by Norris Jackson PICTORIALS
18 Jaye (40-24-33)
34 Kim (37-23-34)
50 Dixie (60FF-24-36)
58 Bethany (46-25-37)
92 Dorota (38-24-36)
106 Victoria (45-24-36) & Jasmine (42-23-35) OTHER PICTORIALS
10 Candidly Yours
Dianne (34-24-32)
Miss Amazon (45-35-40)
Ana (38B-28-36)
D.D. (36-30-41)
41 Classic Collection
Debbie (43-26-37) DEPARTMENTS
5 Mail Slot
Letters to GENT
8 GENT Journal
News from the sex world
25 Fisted Fantasy
Reader masturbation stories
81 The Boob Tube
Big-boob video reviews
EDITORIAL NOTE
We all know something about censorship and the issue of free speech.
Because we each have our own opinions on the subject. Each of us looks
at, reads, and hears things a little differently from each other.
We know that if you are reading this magazine, for instance, that you
are more likely to advocate freedom to read materials of your choice
than are most people. Most Americans would say that the guarantees in
the Constitution are basically a good idea, but if you asked if it's
okay to keep certain books out of libraries and schools, or certain
programs off television, they might hesitate and then qualify their
answers.
The biggest problem with saying it's okay to censor "some" things is
that it is always a completely subjective decision. That is, unless you
are prepared to say, for example, that all nudity is forbidden, each of
us would look at the question from our own perspective. What would
offend a schoolmarm is not likely to get a yawn from you. But how do
you feel about a Maplethorpe exhibit showing one nude peeing into the
mouth of another? That exhibit gave everyone fits a few years ago, and
even staunch anything-goes advocates had some qualms.
A Supreme Court Justice (Potter Stewart) summed up just how subjective
pornography is by admitting that he couldn't really define it, but that
he knew it when he saw it. Talk about confusion! If he knows it when he
sees it, does that mean:
1. He'll always see it the same way in the future?
2. Other judges will see it the same way he does?
3. We'll know what factors go into his decisions?
How does that help an artist, or publisher or movie director stay out
of censorship problems with the "law?" Aren't our laws supposed to be
clear enough so that a law-abiding citizen can know what is and is not
legal in this country? And not risk jail?
We've come a long way, baby, but there are still many politicians (many
now labeled the new "Conservative Right" or "Christian Coalition") who
think we've gone much too far. And so long as we don't have a Supreme
Court that has the courage and honesty to say the Constitution means
what it says (free speech means free speech) but rather what the Court
decides in each and every case what is or is not free speech, we will
have local politicos who know the arrest of a clerk in a video or book
shop is always good for some publicity and votes, no matter who gets
hurt.
Nadine Strossen, the President of the ACLU (American Civil Liberties
Union) said it very well in a recent Playboy interview: "If freedom of
expression doesn't include the right to talk about sex, to look at
pornography, to pose for it, to perform in it, how do I have free
speech?" We are now quite used to nudity and sex scenes in major
Hollywood movies, that just a few years ago were automatically censored
by fearful prudes who predicted the end of the civilized world if
people were exposed to such filth. Well, the world hasn't ended, so
maybe it's time we "went for it" and gave the concept of "free speech"
a real try.
— The Publisher
