Buy adult magazine back issues at Magazine Empire Magazine Empire phone number contact 800 number free
WonderClub Search Engine Submit Button
Celebrities

Mandate Magazine Back Issue, June 1996

Mandate June 1996 magazine back issue Mandate magizine back copy mandate gay porn magazine 1996 back issues hot latin men hung studs horny hard cocks dirty three-way
Buy Digital  USD$49.99

WonderClub View Cart Button

Mandate June 1996 Magazine

ISSN: 0360-1005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MEN
9 Darren Wright
17 Manuel Sleeps Over
31 Anonymous
43 Dane
53 Carlos
65 Steve Pierce
77 Michael Cody
FICTION
25 Fare Trade
38 Bunking Together
60 Outdoor Three-way
FEATURES
5 Editor's Note
6 Mandata
16 Man Mail
72 Book Nook
84 Man Video
90 Walk-in Closet

EDITOR'S NOTE
DON'T ADJUST YOUR SET
What's wrong with this picture?
A sex therapist is on a TV talk show asking a nineteen-year-old (very handsome) straight guy to describe a traUmma-porn-star">Umatic incident from his past. In this case, the "traUmma-porn-star">Uma" involves his best male friend confessing (gasp) a sexual attraction towards him and asking if he had ever been curious about doing it with a guy. This is clearly painful for the straight guy to reveal on national television and causes the therapist to affect the stagiest look of concern, but gets a laugh from the audience. "I didn't know what to do," he laments, "and we were at the gym at the time, wearing just underwear."
After a few more titters, empathetic glances, unenlightened questions and uncomfortable silences it is revealed that (surprise, surprise) he had "no clue"—that his friend was gay, that is.
Then tie therapist (after consoling him with the banal insight that it sometimes can be frightfully hard to tell whether a person is gay) pronounces: "Although the question is not in and of itself aggressive, it is wrong for anyone to impose his sexuality on someone else at any time." She then congraTulates the "victim" for handling it like a gentleman, and for having the "courage" not to respond by calling his inquisitive pal names!
What the fuck is that all about!?! The gay guy never even touched him! So now, apparently, not only are we as gay men supposed to be "discreet" (read: keep our filthy little homo secret to ourselves) or risk being accused of forcing our attentions on poor unfortunate straights, but we're supposed to be grateful if we're not verbally harassed!?!?
The part that angered me the most about the show was that the panel was full of gay men and not one of them objected to the subtle gay bashing going on around them. Why? Because they, like too many of us, have grown accustomed to it.
This (by no means atypical) episode brought to mind how tired I am of the fact that being gay is perceived as a bad thing. Different still equals bad. For example, you can be sued for calling someone queer. The talk show scenario also clearly illustrates the fact that the hUmma-porn-star">Uman race currently operates with a presumption of heterosexuality. Unless we say otherwise, we're `just like them." Why should we have to come out a dozen or so times every month just because the average person can't see past his or her white picket sexuality? Do you suppose anyone complained about the young man on the talk show shoving his straightness in America's face? In this country, it seems, one is innocent until proven gay.
Now don't get the impression I'm necessarily down on talk shows per se. Fact is, I'm a voyeur just like everybody else—I enjoy gawking as much the next guy. But when gays are trotted out for what amounts to repression training—again and again—and they don't even know it, it just points out what limited progress we've achieved.
Well, fuck that noise. I for one will not check my big gay luggage at the door, just because it makes some het fellow-traveler uncomfortable. I refuse to take responsibility for his insecurities. Because I know if I passively accept this "don't tell" bullshit, I'm contributing to keeping homosexuality invisible. Which indicates to me that simply being out is no longer enough, and that silence functions as a form of apology.
If you're wondering what brought on this little tirade, it is this: I've been invited to appear on a few talk shows later this year. Consequently I've been watching them, and imagining myself publicly reflecting on what it's like to be a gay pornographer.
Will I go on? As to that, I haven't made up my mind yet. It's not that I'm afraid of the ambush—I can handle that. (As a matter of fact, they don't know what they're letting themselves in for.) But when I picture being asked, "Doesn't it hurt?" or "But what about love?" why do I get this enervating feeling, like: "They still don't get it. We're still at square one. They're never going to get it."? Not to mention the dilemma of how the hell I'm going to discuss my work without saying the word "dick."
On the other hand, maybe I should just refuse to buy into the game. Just show up for the goof, like maybe bring a few models on the show with me, pull down my pants, cause a scene, whatever.
So what do you guys think? Go? Don't go? Be cordial? Let 'em have it? I'd be interested in your input, write in and tell me what you'd do in my (size 10, by the way) shoes.
In the meantime, I'll just keep working away at my first love: pornography. After all, it seems to me pornography addresses a far more fundamental need than any talk show I've ever seen. After all—I've never seen a talk show that I could jerk off to. Have you?
Doug McClemont
Editor-in-Chief

1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009

Select Discontinued Titles

Select Magazines by Price

Magazines by Category

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? SEARCH HERE

X
WonderClub Home