6 JANDI AND ARIEL—TONGUE TIED Photography by Lee Forbes
15 CHAIN MAIL
Whippings and Clippings From Kinkster Correspondents
16 SUB-SPACE
Meeting Master Right, Caning Cravings, Service for Two
by Nina Hartley
20 JULIE—PURELY PERVERTED
Photography by Sexkicks
26 CRYSTAL AND TITUS—SPANKING CLEAN
Photography by DDF Productions
34 KITTEN LOVES THE WHIP
Submissive Sex Goddess Satine Makes—and Takes—Her Mark
Special Feature by Ernest Greene
Photography by Ken Marcus
42 BROOKE—PASSION PIT
Photography by Matti Klatt
52 PERCILLA—POSTED PARCEL
Photography by John Donegan
58 ASHLEY, JULIUS AND GORGUS—SERVICE BEFORE SALE
Photography by Dave Naz
94 WILD SEAS—PART ONE
Graphic Novel by Templeton
EDITORIAL NOTE
STRICTLY SPEAKING
The pery demographic isn't much use to anyone's political ambitions and we do
it no favor by endorsing any candidate we'd actually like to see elected. While
we don't share the orgasmic enthusiasm for The New Guy of some of our friends,
we're pretty sure The Old Guy would definitely come down on the makingthings-worse
side as far as our little, leather-and-rubber-clad crowd is concerned. But we
have no illusions regarding the kind of triangulation (to use a thoroughly soiled
word) that an incoming president already hammered for his supposed liberalism
(of which we've seen no evidence whatsoever thus far) would use to secure his
situation among those "values voters" whose principle values orbit around
hating our guts. They hate porn. They hate sexually deviant behavior of any kind
(well, except for polygamy and the coercion of child brides). And while he probably
won't have the outgoing administration's appetite for criminally prosecuting sexual
speech, he will also have those Hillary voters twisting his nuts for "regulations"
to "protect" women from the scourge of cultural pornification in all
its forms. That doesn't sound like much fun either.
However, there is one important matter at stake in this otherwise historic-but-profoundly-tedious
match-up that concerns us directly: the composition of a Supreme Court that will
outlast this and several presidencies-to follow. Our rights not only to view what
we find sexually exciting as consenting adults, but also to engage in sexual behavior
of our own choice as consenting adults in private hang by the slender threads
of two previous Supreme Court rulings, one by Miller v. California and the other
by Lawrence v. Texas. The overturning of the former would be the end of what you're
reading right now and of the latter the end of what you're planning to do later
tonight with your partner. You might want to think that over before you decide
to choose one guy or the other or not bother to choose either, for not to decide
is also a decision, and it could cost all of us plenty.
—Ernest Greene, Executive Editor
